John and I are debating something about the Godfather. He says it is unrealistic to think that Michael would get married so quickly in Italy. His argument is that Michael always has a plan, and wouldn't do something so impulsive.
I think that it is precisely because it is so against his nature that he gets married. He's alone in a foreign country, having just thrown away the life he had planned to avenge the attack on and betrayal of his father. He's left he woman he loves behind, and is faced with an uncertain future. Why wouldn't he grasp at something safe and traditional and comforting like marriage to the beautiful daughter of a powerful man?
And of course, it is her tragic death that allows him to become the ruthless man he needs to be to become his father's successor. It's a key point to moving the plot forward.
Or, at least, that's how I interpret the story. It's sadder that way, I think, which makes it even better. There's something about a story where you know the "hero" is doomed. John and I both love stories like that. Don't get me wrong -- I love a happy ending too. In fact, most of the time, even when I know what is coming, I'm still hoping for a happy ending. I am a big gooey wheel of cheese who wants everyone to live in a world with true love and puppies and rainbows. But I love a sad story too.
I think I had a point back when I started writing this, but I've completely forgotten where I was going, and now I'm tired. So...I'll settle for asking -- what's your favorite? Happy ending or sad story?
The Godfather movies are awesome. I think the reason I like them so much is because they are not "happy ending" movies. I prefer bittersweet - like at the end of the third movie where the next generation takes over and Michael is finally "out".
sad story, absolutely