John and I watched the Guy Ritchie movie Revolver last night. After the movie ended and the screen faded to black, John brought up Google and typed in "revolver Ritchie what the fuck" That gives you our reaction in a nutshell.
I was pleased when John told me he'd stumbled across a Guy Ritchie movie we'd never heard of before. Little did I know that there is a good reason that this movie wasn't widely promoted. I wonder if it was ever even released in the theaters. Going in, I really expected to like this movie. There are three main reasons why:
Guy Ritchie. I loved Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch.
Jason Statham. I admit it, I'm a fan. I even enjoyed the over-the-top piece of ridiculousness that was Crank, but I could not find anything to like about his performance in this movie.
Ray Liotta. We know from Goodfellas that he can do a great job playing a gangster. He just didn't do that in Revolver.
You can probably tell that I didn't like the movie at all. The only nice thing I can say about it is that visually it was very interesting, with a comic-book feel. As for the rest, the plot doesn't go anywhere, and the stuff that does happen doesn't make sense. Jason Statham has lank, stringy long hair and looks awful. Plus, he doesn't get to do what he does best, which is drive fast and kick ass. Ray Liotta was just a plain mess, but I'm guessing it is hard to do a good job when you have no idea what the hell your character is doing or why he is doing it.
I spent the entire movie waiting for something to come along and explain what the hell was going on in the story. It was supposed to be a sort of straightforward revenge tale, perhaps with a side of a good con thrown in for good measure. Except that supernatural-ish stuff happened and no one explained how. At first I thought that Andre from OutKast and the guy who played Big Pussy were magical somehow. Then I thought they were con men who had known Jason Statham's character Jake in prison. Then I thought they were figments of his imagination. Then I just wanted the damn movie to end. There was double-dealing and conning and triple-dealing, but I never figured out what the point of any of it was. Andre and Big Pussy ended up with all of the drugs and all of the money, and they gave some of it away, and some of it back to Ray Liotta at the end...maybe.
The only interesting character in the whole thing was a hit man called Sorter, who could kill anyone. Except, apparently not Jake, and anyway, it was just a small role. You could never be quite sure if you were in the present or in a flashback, and you never got any payoff for why the characters were doing what they did. I generally like stories where the reader or viewer gets to imagine what happens next, but not in the case of this movie! Mostly because I had no idea what I had just watched. Yes, there were events that unfolded in a sequence, and there were flashbacks. Usually the flashbacks add to the narrative and help to move the story along, but in Revolver they just add more questions. I read some of the other reviews online, and there were people saying "oh, if you don't like it, you just don't get it" and "you have to watch the movie several times before you understand it." First of all, I'm smart. I've watched a ton of artsy-fartsy movies in my time, and I've understood and enjoyed many of them. There wasn't anything to "get" about this movie. It was just poorly done. Second, you could not pay me to watch that movie again. Well, you could pay me, but the cost would be prohibitive.
I think Guy Ritchie is a really talented and creative guy, and I hope he gets back on track. If Revolver is what being married to Madonna did for him, he's better off without her. Do yourself a favor - do not watch this movie.